Patent

15/06/2026
USPTO Patent Application - Noah ArkCore Hybrid Propulsion System

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Utility Patent Application

Publication Type: Non-Provisional Application
Filing Date: [To be assigned]
Application Number: [To be assigned by USPTO]

Title

HYBRID QUANTUM VACUUM ENERGY EXTRACTION AND ANTIMATTER CONFINEMENT PROPULSION SYSTEM WITH EMBEDDED QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION CONTROL

Applicant

Legal Entity Address Nationality
Noah's Ark Quantum Tech Lab, SAS 142 Avenue René Cassin, 75016 Paris, FRANCE French

Inventors

Name Residence Citizenship Contribution
Noah Kouadri Khazar Paris, France French System architecture, Casimir physics, antimatter confinement
Adam Kouadri Paris, France French AI optimization, quantum control algorithms, embedded systems
Sarah Kouadri Paris, France French Ecological design, materials selection, thermal management

Priority Claim

[0001] This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/XXX,XXX, filed [DATE], entitled "Hybrid ZPE-Antimatter Propulsion System with QEC Control," and under 35 U.S.C. §119(a) to French Patent Application No. FR 2026/XXXXX, filed [DATE]. The entire contents of each of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference.

Cross-Reference to Related Applications

[0002] Not applicable.

Statement Regarding Federally Sponsored Research

[0003] Not applicable.

Background of the Invention

Field of the Invention

[0004] The present invention relates generally to advanced spacecraft propulsion systems, and more particularly to a hybrid propulsion architecture combining quantum vacuum energy extraction, antimatter confinement and annihilation, and quantum error correction (QEC) based real-time control for high-specific-impulse, high-thrust-density space propulsion and terrestrial energy generation applications.

Description of Related Art

[0005] Conventional spacecraft propulsion relies on chemical combustion of propellants (hydrazine, liquid oxygen/kerosene, liquid hydrogen/oxygen) or electric propulsion (ion engines, Hall-effect thrusters, magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters). These systems are fundamentally limited by the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, requiring exponential propellant mass for high delta-V missions. Specific impulses (Isp) range from 300-450 seconds for chemical systems to 1,500-3,000 seconds for electric systems, with thrust-to-weight ratios generally below 10⁻³ for electric propulsion.

[0006] Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) and nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) offer improved performance (Isp ~ 900-2,000 s) but face severe political, safety, and proliferation concerns. Project Prometheus (NASA, 2003-2005) and subsequent NTP programs have not achieved flight demonstration due to these constraints.

[0007] Antimatter propulsion has been theorized since the 1950s. The annihilation of protons and antiprotons (p + p̄) or electrons and positrons (e⁻ + e⁺) converts 100% of rest mass to energy (E = mc²), yielding specific energies of 9×10¹³ J/g for proton-antiproton and 1.8×10¹⁴ J/g for electron-positron. However, practical implementation faces three fundamental challenges: (a) Production: Current antiproton production at CERN yields ~10⁷ p̄/year at costs exceeding $60 trillion/gram; (b) Confinement: Charged antimatter must be stored in Penning traps or magnetic bottles with lifetimes limited by vacuum quality and magnetic field stability; (c) Thrust conversion: Efficient conversion of annihilation products to directed thrust requires complex magnetic nozzles or ablative shields.

[0008] Positron Dynamics (U.S., founded ~2015) proposed positron annihilation propulsion using sodium-22 (²²Na) radioisotope sources, achieving NASA NIAC Phase I/II funding. However, this approach is limited to positron-electron annihilation (no antiprotons), lacks energy extraction from the quantum vacuum, and does not incorporate quantum computing-based control.

[0009] Zero-point energy (ZPE) extraction via the Casimir effect has been theoretically studied and experimentally demonstrated at nanometer scales. The dynamical Casimir effect (DCE) in non-stationary systems and analog Hawking radiation in Bose-Einstein condensates suggest energy extraction from quantum vacuum fluctuations is physically possible under specific conditions. Recent metamaterial-enhanced Casimir systems and analogue dynamic Schwinger effect demonstrations have advanced the field.

[0010] Quantum error correction (QEC) using surface codes, qLDPC codes, and implementations on superconducting qubits, trapped ions, and nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond have achieved logical error rates below 10⁻³ per cycle. Real-time quantum control using machine learning enables adaptive stabilization of quantum systems.

[0011] No prior art combines: (i) quantum vacuum energy extraction via metamaterial-enhanced dynamical Casimir effect; (ii) antimatter confinement in integrated Penning micro-traps; (iii) hybrid energy transduction via magnon-photon coupling and Josephson junction arrays; and (iv) real-time quantum error correction control using embedded neural networks for autonomous optimization of all subsystems.

Brief Summary of the Invention

[0012] The present invention provides a hybrid propulsion system and method that overcomes the limitations of prior art by synergistically combining four technological pillars:

[0013] First, a metamaterial-enhanced dynamical Casimir effect resonator (DCR) extracts energy from quantum vacuum fluctuations through controlled modulation of boundary conditions at THz frequencies, using piezoelectric actuation of nanostructured plasmonic surfaces.

[0014] Second, an integrated Penning micro-trap array confines antiprotons and/or positrons using superimposed static magnetic and electric fields on a semiconductor chip, with autonomous refueling from radioisotope sources or external accelerator interfaces.

[0015] Third, a hybrid transduction chain converts extracted ZPE and controlled antimatter annihilation energy into usable electromagnetic radiation and directed thrust via: (a) yttrium iron garnet (YIG) sphere magnon-photon coupling in microwave cavities; (b) superconducting Josephson junction arrays for AC-DC conversion; and (c) quantum Stirling engines for thermal-to-mechanical energy conversion.

[0016] Fourth, an embedded quantum error correction controller using NV-center diamond qubits and neural network-based decoding maintains coherence of all quantum subsystems while optimizing energy extraction and thrust vectoring in real time.

[0017] The invention achieves theoretical specific impulses exceeding 10⁶ seconds with thrust-to-power ratios of 10-100 N/MW, enabling rapid transit to Mars (≤45 days), outer planet missions (≤2 years to Saturn), and ultimately interstellar precursor missions.

FIG. 1 — Schematic perspective view of the complete Noah ArkCore hybrid propulsion system 10 installed in a spacecraft hull 12, showing the spatial arrangement of all seven principal subsystems with thermal stratification indicated by color gradient.

QECC 60 NV-Center Surface Code 10 mK MDCR 40 Casimir Resonator 10 mK IPMTA 30 Penning Micro-Traps 10 mK HTC 50 YIG-Josephson Transduction 10 mK-4 K MSCS 70 Cryogenic System 4 K - 300 K ASM 20 ²²Na Source or CERN 4 K - 300 K EAIOE 80 AI Engine 4 K - 300 K THRUST e⁺/p̄ ZPE Annih. Control NOAH ARKCORE SYSTEM 10 Spacecraft Hull 12 100 mm

FIG. 2 — Block diagram of the system architecture, showing energy flows (solid red arrows) and information/control flows (dashed blue arrows) between all modules.

ASM 20
²²Na / CERN
IPMTA 30
Penning Traps
HTC 50
Transduction
THRUST
MDCR 40
Casimir Cavity
HTC 50
(continued)
QECC 60
NV-Center QEC
◄──► EAIOE 80
Neural Network
MSCS 70
10 mK ─ 300 K
Heat Rejection to Space

TABLE 1: Principal Subsystems

Ref. Num. Subsystem Name Function Operating Temperature Mass (kg)
20 Antimatter Source Module (ASM) Production/storage of antiprotons/positrons 4 K – 300 K 35
30 Integrated Penning Micro-Trap Array (IPMTA) Confinement and manipulation of charged antimatter 10 mK – 4 K 12
40 Metamaterial Dynamical Casimir Resonator (MDCR) Extraction of energy from quantum vacuum fluctuations 10 mK – 1 K 8
50 Hybrid Transduction Chain (HTC) Conversion of quantum/exotic energy to directed thrust 10 mK – 300 K 15
60 Quantum Error Correction Controller (QECC) Real-time stabilization and optimization 10 mK – 4 K 5
70 Multi-Stage Cryogenic System (MSCS) Thermal management and heat rejection 4 K – 300 K 120
80 Embedded AI Optimization Engine (EAIOE) Neural network-based autonomous control 4 K – 300 K 3
TOTAL SYSTEM MASS ~200 kg

FIG. 3 — Cross-sectional view of the metamaterial dynamical Casimir effect resonator (MDCR) 40, showing the layered structure and piezoelectric actuation mechanism.

SUBSTRATE 52 — Titanium Grade 2
INSULATING LAYER 54 — SiO₂ (PECVD)
BOTTOM ELECTRODE 56 — Au (e-beam evap.)
ACTIVE STACK 58 — [HfO₂ (10nm) / Graphene (0.34nm)] × 10
TOP METASURFACE 60 — Bi₂Se₃ + Au Nanopillar Array (200 nm period)
PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATOR 62 — PZT Thin Film
INTERDIGITATED ELECTRODES 64 — Au

Modulation: d(t) = d₀ + δd sin(Ωt), where d₀ = 100 nm, δd/d₀ ≈ 0.1, Ω ≈ 2ωcav

FIG. 4 — Top plan view of the integrated Penning micro-trap array (IPMTA) 30 chip, showing the 64-site (8×8) configuration with CMOS multiplexing circuitry.

CMOS MULTIPLEXING 36
MPX
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
1,5
1,6
1,7
1,8
MPX
MPX
2,1
2,2
2,3
2,4
2,5
2,6
2,7
2,8
MPX
MPX
3,1
3,2
3,3
3,4
3,5
3,6
3,7
3,8
MPX
MPX
4,1
4,2
4,3
4,4
4,5
4,6
4,7
4,8
MPX
MPX
5,1
5,2
5,3
5,4
5,5
5,6
5,7
5,8
MPX
MPX
6,1
6,2
6,3
6,4
6,5
6,6
6,7
6,8
MPX
MPX
7,1
7,2
7,3
7,4
7,5
7,6
7,7
7,8
MPX
MPX
8,1
8,2
8,3
8,4
8,5
8,6
8,7
8,8
MPX
BOND PADS 35

Substrate 32: Si, 10 mm × 10 mm × 0.5 mm | Pitch: 1.2 mm | Trap sites 34: 64

FIG. 5 — Cross-sectional view of a single Penning trap site 34, showing the magnetic and electric field configuration.

B → ENDCAP 40a (V₀/2) ENDCAP 40b (-V₀/2) RING 38 RF 46 RF 46 e⁺ or p̄ MAGNET 42/44 (1-3 T) r₀ = 80 μm 2z₀ = 100 μm V(r,z) = V₀/2d² × (r² - 2z²)

TABLE 3: IPMTA Operating Parameters

Parameter Value Unit Significance
Magnetic field B 1.0 – 3.0 T Cyclotron frequency 27.9 – 83.8 GHz
Ring voltage V₀ 1.0 – 10.0 V Axial frequency 10 – 100 MHz
Trap depth 1.0 – 10.0 eV Confines 10⁵ K particles
Vacuum pressure < 10⁻¹⁰ mbar 1000+ s positron lifetime
Individual site control 64 sites Parallel operations, redundancy
Loading efficiency > 10 % From moderated beam

FIG. 6 — Schematic diagram of the hybrid transduction chain (HTC) 50, showing YIG-magnon coupling, Josephson junction array, and quantum Stirling engine stages.

STAGE 50A YIG Sphere 72 YIG Cavity 74 (TE₀₁₁) g/2π > 50 MHz Microwave STAGE 50B Josephson Array 76 1000 junctions Al/AlOₓ/Al η > 90% DC Voltage STAGE 50C Quantum Stirling ErNi/Gd 78 η > ηCarnot MECHANICAL WORK To Magnetic Nozzle 82

TABLE 6: HTC Performance Parameters

Stage Input Output Efficiency Key Material
50A ZPE photons, GHz Coherent magnons 50 – 80% YIG (Y₃Fe₅O₁₂)
50B Magnon microwave field DC voltage > 90% Al/AlOₓ/Al
50C DC electrical power Mechanical work 40 – 60% ErNi, Gd
50D Particle/photon momentum Directed thrust 30 – 50% NbTi, W-Cu

FIG. 7 — Block diagram of the quantum error correction controller (QECC) 60, showing NV-center qubit array, surface code layout, and neural network decoder.

NV ARRAY 90 7×7 Grid, 2 μm pitch 49 Physical Qubits SURFACE CODE 92 Distance d = 7 X X X X X X Z Z Z 1 Logical Qubit qLDPC 94 [[144,12,12]] Alternative GNN DECODER 96
Share